Proudly, I now find most of my reading material through Twitter. I save web pages and PDFs I can read even when I don't have an Internet connection. Here are two screenshots, one from The Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL) report
Future Thinking for Academic Librarians in 2025 (David J. Staley, and Kara J. Malenfant, June 2010, 33 pages) and the other from
Our Game Magazine (November 2010, 39 full-color pages, available only online), to give a sense of how comfortable the iPad screen is to read. Note the blue and yellow marks on the ACRL report: my PDF reader allows me to annotate documents for future reference.
{Having tried many Twitter clients, I use Twittelator for the iPhone and Osfoora HD for the iPad. I use Instapaper to save web pages and GoodReader for PDFs. I love FlipBoard for more easily finding the articles those I follow post, and to browse other feeds.}
I also download books from Amazon and use the Kindle app to read them. There are many books available that are out of copyright. Amazon makes it easy to search through them, once you find the
Free Book Collection page.
{I tried the Apple bookstore and app: pretty, but a small offering and impossible to search.}
Why "learning and engagement"?
Is the iPad revolutionary?
As I've explained, I use my iPad for many things I have usually done on my iPhone: the screen is larger and the keyboard actually functional. Other than offering a better Twitter client and offline web page reading, everything I've said I can do using my iPad I could also do using a laptop. Is the iPad really just a weight-saver for me? No, it's much more.
Much to my delight, my iPad has changed the extent to which I engage with other people across North America, and keep up with and learn more about topics that are important to me, personally and professionally. It's the size and shape. It's that I can hold it in my hand. It's that I can read while brushing my teeth. It's that I can use it in the same body positions in which I use a book- leaning on the arm of the couch or even lying on my back with my feet propped up against the wall. The iPad is personal and personable.
In comparison, a computer, even a laptop, is sterile and clumsy. If I try to read a long or complicated article on the computer, I am easily distracted. My gaze is interrupted by what's on my desk or desktop. I glance at what's out the window or in another window and end up peering at the street or checking my email. With my focus nearer and the background blurrier, my concentration is keener. Though the computer sits within my personal space, the words appear outside of myself, even when it's on my lap. The "other," the computer sits; I hold the iPad. My laptop stays in the study. My iPad comes to bed with me, where I have the time and inclination to read through Twitter.
On my computer,
- I could read and listen to the BBC.
- I could respond concisely to an email message.
- I could read Educause and Chronicle of Higher Education articles.
- I could mark up PDFs with my notes for later perusal.
- I could read the web pages and watch the YouTube videos (soccer highlights) I've saved for later.
- I could learn from and with other people.
But I don't.
On my iPad I do all of those things. For better (to me) or for worse (to my family), my iPad has made me more productive, knowledgeable and, especially, connected/plugged in to the broader world.
Some people argue that the iPad is not revolutionary. For me, it is.